2011/7/4 fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com>: > Am 04.07.2011 13:03, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer: >> 2011/7/2 Gary Gallagher <g.null.dev...@gmail.com>: >>> I like the proposal. I'm always coming across barriers I can't adequately >>> tag. The section that also caught my eye was the bit near the end about >>> subtags like barrier:key=yes/no/number. I've been trying to tag in useful >>> ways for the blind and was wondering whether this sort of subtag could be >>> extended to entrances. Or should entrances have an additional barrier=door >>> tag then a barrier:key=yes/no/number tag? >> >> >> Yes, of course these can be added to entrances (that is their main >> purpose). I usually tag entrances with building=entrance. > > I do not know/find barrier=door. Didi I miss something or do you want to > add it to the proposal ?
I do not want to add it, because I think that building=entrance does suit this case (maybe also barrier=gate if you want to use something from the barrier namespace). In my understanding of the wiki and tagging history, barrier=entrance does _not_ fit here, because it defines an opening rather then a closure (IMHO a door can also be closed while an opening/barrier=entrance is always open). cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
