Hi, On Samstag, 16. Juli 2011, Steve Bennett wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:51 PM, SomeoneElse > > <li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk> wrote: > > "highway=path, path=hiking" doesn't say any more to me than > > "highway=footway" on its own would. > > The distinction is "well constructed" versus "rough, minimal > maintenance". > > highway=path, path=hiking: > http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/pictures/12000/nahled/hiking-path > -1-238412973779541Zf.jpg
This way looks wide enough for agricultural vehicles. I'd tag this as: highway=track tracktype=grade2 > highway=footway: > http://www.freefoto.com/images/808/12/808_12_2972---Footpath-through- > Strid-Wood_web.jpg?&k=Footpath+through+Strid+Wood And this as highway=path sac_scale=hiking and maybe surface=ground > This distinction exists and is meaningful. The question is whether > this is a good way to express it. Take a look at taginfo: sac_scale: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/sac_scale#values path: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/path#values surface: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/surface#values Regards Werner (werner2101) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging