2012/2/8 Colin Smale <colin.sm...@xs4all.nl>: > On 08/02/2012 16:00, Martin Vonwald wrote: > question of syntax rather than concept. What triggered my post was actually > a comment by Martin K who also felt a need for multi-value tags (i.e. > arrays) in the context of the floors within a building.
I think you got me wrong there, I was actually against the proposed form of multiple k/v-pairs stuffed all in the value for one key. For the building floors we can do this with several k/v-pairs (each for one floor or maybe range of floors) to keep tagging in a way it works with our established tools. The lane-case is a little different though, because if you have multiple values there (plus a definition from where to start) you won't need lane numbering. For buildings you will have unambigous numbers for the floors anyway, and they are the usual way to identify levels in buildings, but nobody says "take lane 3". cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging