Am 26. Februar 2012 13:17 schrieb Mike Valiant <mike_vali...@hotmail.com>: > That not what the wiki for maxwidth says: " a width limit for using the way" > - no mention of whether it is a legal restriction or not. And in the > discussion of maxwidth "width restriction can be physical, or purely legal"
the wiki is not always easy to read, but you can get the clue if you look at several pages: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width links to maxwidth with this text: "width restriction for vehicles on a road" http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxwidth has a big sign on the right (legal restriction) and links to access for "other restrictions", where the first sentence is: "Access values are used to describe the legal access for highway=*s and other facilities..." The discussion page of maxwidth that you mention links to maxheight discussion. On maxheight discussion it gets pointed out that maxheight is a legal restriction and that a proposal for physical maxheight is to be found here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/clearance this page shows that there was no support for maxheight:legal (because maxheight is already legal) but there was support for maxheight:physical FYI: I added the word "legal" to maxwidth now, so in the future there will be less confusion. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
