Hello, I started working on a draft for a proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:reference_point Please help me!
Thanks. Felix On 03/21/2012 01:09 PM, Felix Delattre wrote: > On 03/21/2012 07:06 AM, Steve Bennett wrote: >> I seem to recall having read either the articles Felix posted, or >> similar ones. The point is, in some countries, these informal >> descriptions actually *are* genuine addresses. There's no other >> addressing system in place, so over time they become the de facto >> standard. So what I think Felix is suggesting is being able to define >> the reference points that addresses are constructed from, in exactly >> the same way as we define name=* for a highway=*, or for a place=*. >> >> I think it's worthy of discussion get this right. landmark=* is >> problematic because as noted there actually may not be a landmark >> (like the little tree which is actually not visible). Some kind of >> addr:reference_point=*? Or maybe a kind of place=*? >> > This is exactly the point what I wanted to touch and consult how we can > define the best generic way. Then documenting it and putting into > practice in these countries. > > I would like to recap: > > * The tag landmark is not suitable for all possible reference points > * A new tag would be a good option > > addr:reference_point=* or reference_point=* > What could be the right values? true, yes, popular, confirmed,...? Any > ideas? > > > On 03/21/2012 08:38 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> On 3/21/2012 9:06 AM, Steve Bennett wrote: >>> The harder question is if you want to try and define actual addresses, >>> like actually putting a unique address description on each dwelling >>> ("From the church, 400m south", "From the church, 380m south with the >>> blue door"). But maybe leave that harder question till later :) >> This is where I get confused. Is the "address" created like this >> actually unique, or are there any number of descriptions that are >> equally valid? >> >> (Aside: I'm reminded of metes and bounds descriptions of property: >> begin at the stake in the old tree at the northeast corner of Bill's >> property, run south 59 degrees east for 600 chains for the point of >> beginning, then run by the following courses... Here of course there >> are many possible starting points and ways to describe the route to >> the point of beginning.) > This goes way to far and, in my opinion, is too complex for considering > it for mapping. I don't think it is necessary (or even possible) to use > exact addresses. Having at least reference points marked in a way > computers can process them would be a big improvement. Let's stick to that. > > Thank you for all your responses. > Felix > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging