Concerning diameter/radius. What if the mini-roundabout isn't round? 2012/6/6 Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk>: > Diameter is more universally understood by the layman than radius. Radius is > normally only used by engineers, scientists and mathematicians. > > Plus it keeps us from having to map fractions. > > Phil > > -- > > Sent from my Nokia N9 > > > On 06/06/2012 13:07 Andrew Errington wrote: > > On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:32:59 Colin Smale wrote: >> On 06/06/2012 09:13, Martin Vonwald wrote: >> > If you want to specify the dimension of the mini-roundabout I think it >> > would be sufficient to specify the width of the approaching roads. >> > >> > Martin >> >> How about diameter=15 on the mini-roundabout node? This is factually >> correct, verifiable on the ground and (IMHO) non-controversial; routing >> would not be affected (no need to route over areas) and renderers can >> draw a bigger blob. Problem solved, simples. > > If we do this I would really love to see the tag as radius=* instead of > diameter=*. > > Thank you, > > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
