Thanks, gave up proposing landuse. Now we have to choose between man_made and amenity: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/apiary#Landuse_vs_man_made_vs_amenity
2012/7/6 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > 2012/7/6 Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de>: > > On 04.07.2012 19:43, Tormi Tabor wrote: > >> Created a new tag proposal for an apiary, let's discuss about it: > >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/apiary > > > > landuse is generally intended for relatively large-scale features. > > > > That you are listing nodes as an option for mapping this feature (and > > not just as a temporary solution, but as a suggested tagging style) is a > > clear sign that landuse is not a good key choice. landuse tags tend to > > be associated with areas almost exclusively. > > > > So I'd prefer if you could come up with a different key for the feature. > > +1 > I'd use amenity from the rarely used tags you list at the bottom of > your proposal. > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
