There is no problem with amenity=drinking_water. The problem arises if you want to indicate the water quality of, say, a fountain: amenity=fountain drinking/potable/drinkable=yes/no
On 12 July 2012 17:41, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2012/7/12 Andrew Errington <erringt...@gmail.com>: > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:21:34 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > Can we introduce "potable=yes/no" and migrate both of those tags to it > over > > time? > > > this issue was already discussed 5 years ago ;-) > Honestly, there were discussions in 2008, as amenity=potable_water was > the original proposal and then was changed to drinking_water because > many mappers objected that potable was less understandable. > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging