A.Pirard.Papou wrote > Q1: which naming of border line piece do you consider valid and > which do you prefer? > Q1a: Municipality1 — Municipality2? > Q1b: Highest-level1 — Highest-level2 (Europe — Asia) > Q1c: Municipality1 — Municipality2 (Highest-level1 — Highest-level2) > ? > Q1d: nothing > Q1e: you're inventive...
Q1e1 : I don't consider any naming invalid, and thus I don't change what others have done Q1e2 : However I don't like using some strange caracters my keyboard does'nt have like — Q1d : And I don't personnaly add any name on a new way I've created A.Pirard.Papou wrote > Q2: do you see any use for that apparently useless number? Could it > be omitted? I don't add it myself, but I still add boundary=administrative (not because I think it is usefull, but because I've been told it helps other mappers at identifing that a way is a boundary) A.Pirard.Papou wrote > 3) And we're ruled by chickens and eggs. No chickens ever ruled me, as of eggs, I'm less sure.... A.Pirard.Papou wrote > Could it be used for boundaries? It could, it is, and I proposed a relation type for that : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/boundary_segment The next question being : is the data usable and used ? The anwser hides in the egg of the next hen to rule me... -- sly -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Naming-boundary-ways-tp5728863p5728971.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
