2012/10/28 Alberto <albertoferra...@fastwebnet.it> > > 1) Polygon vs point for "Populated urban areas" (place=city, town...): > > Hello, we talked about this problem in Italian list [1]. > We agreed that boundaries and places should not be confused because in > general they refer to different things. > We also agreed that tagging the urban area with landuse=residential is > wrong > in most cases because the urban area comprehends also commercial and > industrial zones. > We concluded that to maintain compatibility with places tagged only on the > central node, it would be appropriate to maintain the tag place=* on the > node and to tag the urban area polygon with a new tag. > We created a new proposal for urban area tagging [2]: any advice is > appreciated. >
I've reviewed Sylvain's notes in the Talk page, and I hope I've addressed them in a satisfying manner. I've also added more detail to the proposal. Ciao, Simone > [1] > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Tag-place-ridondanti-td5727924.html#a5729470 > [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Urban_settlements >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
