2012/11/23 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > > Maybe access=residents? >
Access=residents is a bit too general, but that's exactly how signs in Croatia look: "No access except residents". (Then I say, "well I'm a resident" and laugh to myself). at least we shouldn't put wrong restrictions on purpose, because this > will prevent any software or human from understanding the situation. A > fixme is there to sign an error, it is not something I'd want to have > peramently on the map, and a note is OK for human trying to understand > the situation but we shouldn't rely on this when tagging a situation. > > cheers, > Martin > I had an idea to take this further. For example, you have to map a case where residents of an address number can access a road. You make a relation with members that are exactly like a turn restriction that forbids turning into that road. Than you add new members to that relation, like housenumbers, private parking places, or maybe a village. Their roles could be something like "except". That way, if somebody asks a router to go to that address, router can automaticaly pass him through. Or if the router can route through a border that only residents of a certain village can go through, the router could ask "are you from this village". Janko Mihelić
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
