Martin : that's where the type 'site' make sense, it could either be a resort or a 'domaine skiable'.
For nordic and downhill, two sites or a semicolon ? That is the question. ----- Reply message ----- De : "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdre...@gmail.com> Pour : "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <tagging@openstreetmap.org> Objet : [Tagging] Re : Ski resort (once again) Date : lun., févr. 4, 2013 22:44 2013/2/4 yvecai <yve...@gmail.com>: > Anyway, these site=piste relation members would simply be related by ... > ski. > Minimal tagging would be: >> type=site >> site=piste >> piste:type=nordic > > or > >> type=site >> site=piste >> piste:type=downhill > > Then, optionnally, name, operator, url. aren't there resorts which offer both, alpine and nordic pistes? > I came here about this idea when I was shown this: > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/piste%3Aamenity#values > Maybe these cafes, shelters, ... could be members of the site relation, > maybe not, but there is apparently a need here to link them to the nearby > pistes. by looking at what wikipedia writes about resorts in various languages (en,de,fr) it seems as if the piste is more an extra for one or more hotels, and that it might actually be the hotels which constitute the main part of the resort. http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resort cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
