On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:59 AM, John Sturdy <jcg.stu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:47 PM, fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly: >> > Hey >> > >> > Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for >> > broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice >> > task for a bot. >> >> Sorry, numbers are towards "leaved". >> >> > On the other hand, I wonder if it is useful to use type=* and not >> > tree_type=* or tree:type=* as type is the key for relations and it is >> > not that good to use different meanings of one key. >> > > On further thought, I'd go for type=deciduous, rather than > broad-lea[fv]ed. Not quite the same thing (I think larches are deciduous > but not broad-leaved) but I think it's the normal "technical" term (the > others being "evergreen"). > > __John > > +1 I suspect the intent was to tag deciduous trees rather than broadleaf(v)ed trees. There are a number of broadleaf evergreens. Good luck on leafed vs. leaved - some British dictionaries list one as a definition for the other :-) Murry (not a British English speaker)
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
