I'd update the definition to state facilities housing law enforcement and/or visitor assistant services such as those commonly found in National Parks, Forests, Wildlife Refuges, and State Parks. Tag should not be used on facilities that do not include a law enforcement function such as information kiosks or campground registration offices. In most cases, a single structure will house many of these services.
Current text only references national parks. From: Clifford Snow [mailto:cliff...@snowandsnow.us] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:42 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools; talk-us-...@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us-nps] [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - ranger_station On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote: After reading the discussion and incorporating what I could, I am moving http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dranger_st ation to the next step. Please comment per voting procedures, here or on the talk page. I like your proposal. It would simplify mapping in parks with dedicated ranger stations. Since there are 59 National Parks on our radar, each with a least one ranger station, often more, the feature will be used throughout the US. A Wikipedia search list over 6,000 results for ranger stations. The first few pages appear to be sites that should be mapped. -- Clifford OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging