Hi, I'm still puzzled about the "right" value to introduce (or to use as it exists)...
Additionnaly to power=tower/pole, 2 main solutions sound good to me : 1 - Introduce brand new values man_made=power_tower/power_pole and start using them without any tower:type=* subcategories. + New tags, not so many confilcts with existing features. + No additional tags to add, self contained class inside man_made=power_tower/power_pole. - Specific power tags, worst reusability. 2 - Using man_made=tower/mast + tower:type=power. + Common tags, no new values, no additional semantic cluttering - Need to be qualified with tower:type, is this really a problem ? Both have advantages and disadvantages. The "same" question was asked earlier this day about telecom networks. It would be great if a common solution can be found. For example : * Power : man_made=tower/mast tower:type=power * Telecommunications man_made=tower/mast tower:type=communication Thank you for your comments. François. *François Lacombe* francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu http://www.infos-reseaux.com 2013/8/18 François Lacombe <francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu> > Hi, > > Power transmission refinement proposal have been updated with new values > for man_made=*. > > No deprecation for power=* values. > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_transmission_refinement > > More info on Talk. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Power_transmission_refinement#Power_vs_man_made_for_towers_and_poles > > I hope this alternative will receive more positive opinion than before. > > > Have a nice day. > > *François Lacombe* > > francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu > http://www.infos-reseaux.com > > > 2013/8/17 François Lacombe <francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu> > >> I totally agree with Janko. >> >> A meta-tagging model will allow more agility when tag a replaced or >> deprecated. >> >> *François Lacombe* >> >> francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu >> http://www.infos-reseaux.com >> >> >> 2013/8/17 Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> >> >>> I agree with the reasoning behind man_made=pole, but the semantic >>> infrastructure behind osm is not yet strong enough. I think a second layer >>> should be there, a semantic model which says what certain key-values >>> actually mean, and which could be easily changed. The renderers could then >>> be bound to that model, not the rugged key-values. >>> >>> Janko >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
