Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/10/2 John F. Eldredge <j...@jfeldredge.com> > > > I think it makes sense to tag a no-longer-maintained hiking trail in > a > > manner that will still be rendered, but will be rendered in a manner > that > > distinguishes it from an actively-maintained trail. > > > > what is rendered or not in a given map is the decision of the style > sheet > maintainer, from the data point we should make it clear what kind of > object > it is, so that the data consumer can decide whether he wants this kind > of > object in his style or not. > > cheers, > Martin > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
My point was that the tagging needs to indicate maintained vs. non-maintained, and preferably also any known problems that would make an unmaintained trail impassable, tagged at the location of the problem, such as a section blocked by a landslide or a heavy growth of briars. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging