Am 08.10.2013 20:16, schrieb Volker Schmidt:
Just for your reference - while for many cases, I agree that
bicycle=no
is appropriate, there are quite interesting cycleways in the Czech
Republic, where using bicycle=dismount for nodes on a path would
make things easier for people editing OSM. Consider this:
http://img.ct24.cz/cache/900x700/article/20/1936/193540.jpg
http://img.ct24.cz/multimedia/videos/image/646/medium/193542.jpg
(and don't ask me what idiot proposed a cycleway like this).
This is the standard way of doing things here in Italy as well. At
every "end of cycleway" sign you are legally supposed to dismount and
cross the lateral road as pedestrian
well, as it is also signed as the end of the legal footway/sidewalk - in
my opinion it is no need for a _dismount_ there.
In my opinion it is just a legal backdoor, that on these driveways (or
serviceways?) you leave the legal cycleway/footway (with the regarding
legal rights above the otherwise crossing traffic) and have to obey the
crossing traffic for your own risk - even as walker, but also as cyclist.
Georg
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
