Hi Dom, I don't know about voting ...
But I read your interesting proposal. I completely agree that indoor-playgrounds should be mapped. In Switzerland, it seems that they are normally mapped as leisure=playground and indoor=yes, see example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1687169329 I personally think that keeping things together is better, so why not stay with playground? There are managed playgrounds, and there are indoor_play which are free. There are outdoor playgrounds with opening-hours .... So, why not use: Leisure=playground Indoor=yes|no Fee=yes|no Managed=yes|no Opening-hours=* Operatortype=public|private Operator=* etc. Maybe a template would help more than a new tag? Greetings, nounours Am 04.11.2013 um 14:07 schrieb Dominic Hosler: > Hi everyone, > It has been almost two weeks and the discussion seems to have died down. > How long should it be left, before initiating a vote, and how long > should a vote last on the proposal? > This is the relevant wiki page: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Indoor_play > Thanks, > Dom > > On 24 October 2013 14:23, Jonathan <bigfatfro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That's definitely better but I would make the description more generic, such >> as "An indoor area for children to play" and then make the padded aspects, >> cafe etc sub tags that can be added. The indoor_play tag should be able to >> be used by those in other countries who have similar facilities but minus >> the padding or cafe. The tage of indoor_play needs to be the umbrella tag. >> >> Jonathan >> >> http://bigfatfrog67.me >> >> >> On 24/10/2013 12:13, Dominic Hosler wrote: >>> >>> Thanks, I feel a bit silly now, I didn't look hard enough. >>> New page is at: >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Indoor_play >>> for anyone wanting another look. >>> Thanks, >>> Dom >>> >>> >>> On 24 October 2013 12:04, Matthijs Melissen <i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Use the arrow down button on the upper right (next to the Search box) >>>> and choose 'Move'. >>>> >>>> -- Matthijs >>>> >>>> On 24 October 2013 12:59, Dominic Hosler <dominichos...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have updated the page to indoor play, but I don't know how to >>>>> actually change the title of the page? >>>>> >>>>> Do I need to just delete that one and create a new proposal called >>>>> Indoor play? >>>>> Putting a note in the discussion that it has been migrated from the >>>>> previous soft play proposal? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Dom >>>>> >>>>> On 23 October 2013 20:51, Dominic Hosler <dominichos...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree we should move away from the trademarked title 'soft_play'. >>>>>> Perhaps >>>>>> if we keep the proposal and change the name of the tag to indoor_play, >>>>>> to >>>>>> include other types as well, as per brad's suggestion. We should also >>>>>> include sub tag qualifiers to specify if it's soft play and for what >>>>>> ages >>>>>> it's designed. I think it would be most appropriate to use indoor play >>>>>> considering its catch all nature and the fact that it is already used >>>>>> by a >>>>>> couple of websites. >>>>>> >>>>>> I will update the proposal and fill in the definition area, I must have >>>>>> just >>>>>> missed it. However, I won't update it till tomorrow because I only have >>>>>> my >>>>>> phone until then. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Dom >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jonathan <bigfatfro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree, we need to choose a term that is more generic, maybe >>>>>>> leisure=childrens_adventure or kids_play or kids_amusement. There can >>>>>>> always be a sub tag defining soft_play? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Especially considering that a lot of softplay areas are now included >>>>>>> among >>>>>>> other internal children's play features? Softplay is just one bit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://bigfatfrog67.me >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 23/10/2013 17:47, Brad Neuhauser wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Instead of "soft play", what about "indoor play" (or indoor play >>>>>>> area/centre)? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1) it seems to be used as a catch all sometimes, even in the UK (ie - >>>>>>> http://www.timeout.com/london/events/indoor-play-centres-in-london or >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.dayoutwiththekids.co.uk/things-to-do-family/Northampton/Indoor-Play-Areas) >>>>>>> 2) it is broad enough to cover all of these sort of places, since some >>>>>>> indoor play areas may only have some actual "soft play" equipment >>>>>>> meant for >>>>>>> younger kids/toddlers (or, if you are only meaning the actual areas >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> have the soft play equipment, then that might be different) >>>>>>> 3) it might make more sense for those outside the UK who don't use the >>>>>>> term "soft play" much >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Brad >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Dominic Hosler >>>>>>> <dominichos...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Due to child protection, you are generally not allowed to take >>>>>>>> pictures inside the soft-play centres. Also, any official pictures >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>> copyrighted. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the proposal, I linked to a few websites of some soft play >>>>>>>> centres, >>>>>>>> where they have pictures, I hoped this would be fine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Soft play is as Jonathan said, padding not inflatables. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Dom >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 23 October 2013 14:31, Jonathan Bennett <jonobenn...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 23/10/2013 14:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Would they qualify as soft play? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, that's a bouncy castle. Soft play is padding, not inflatables. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>>>>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>>>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging