-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On 11/24/2013 09:45 AM, Manuel Hohmann wrote:
> In the two voting periods that this proposal has run through the 
> following results have been obtained:
> 
> - First voting period: 6 times yes. - Second voting period: 18
> times yes, 18 times no, 1 partial approve.

This means that by any traditional reading, the proposal has been
rejected, even though you seem to avoid the word.

> This result therefore suggests the following possibilities for
> proceeding with this proposal:
> 
> - Those who voted against the proposal need to agree on how to
> change it such that it will become more acceptable.

I don't see why the onus should be on those who voted against the
proposal. I could also say that those who voted for the proposal need
to work on it to make it more acceptable.

> - Use the proposed features as they are.

Yes, anyone is free to use any features, proposed or not, rejected or not.

> For this reason the status has for now been reset to "proposed",
> until there is further progress.

That's a great idea, we simply get rid of the "rejected" status and
anything that is not accepted remains in "proposed" forever ;)

Of course this opens the question - what if someone wanted to propose
a *different* tagging of lamps, should they then overwrite the page
with their proposal or should we simply have a ton of proposals in
parallel?

Bye
Frederik

- -- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSkwTzAAoJEOx/uhGAJu9Hf1oH/A1qEcYczVXITa1MVJXJaUhL
K8iPkjDtwnFlRDy3KpDXQaaPkyuzkFgb8IPCQXfvoyKQFm+lhRHD2xCnonlghrOG
DMWtnlyB9AaJEbEBMD8NOQB7bwj8Uytndq5Bv9bAeMhS9DIPwcNl7W3d7BQgp0lH
hqGgFE//k+vNRPV0d6A+SLsy+h2XOgu2uP7SI1zQYGjlK1F+ESRefuRr15OXt5nH
nlmeIhFHb9zlMWahfE1gp3Jw8zyhzua+wGnVkEnWNeeLAnOQ8wdGWRt4YCNHO/TM
JI45HqiX0hH3IFoPRDQva0efpDsvaQ51wQ2YjVljoRcI4T5qh1eDBBEeCwjd6kQ=
=RtJ4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to