2014-03-08 20:12 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
> > I think you do not need peninsula:1:en=... > Why not simply natural=peninsula name=* etc.? > If they are nested you can see this from the geometry data. > Because the same coastline would have both peninsula names. 2014-03-08 22:55 GMT+01:00 Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org>: > > I don't like your proposal. > > First of all, if people were to really use this, *every* *single* > *piece* of coastline of mainland Europe would receive one extra tag > (namely saying "this is part of the European peninsula"). If you happen > to be in Spain it woudl be two extra tags, and in some areas up to four > as you point out. > > And that's only for one langauge. Undoubtedly the language buffs would > be all over this new field of endeavour in no time, and then every piece > of Spanish coastline would have about 80 new tags or so. > > Or have I misunderstood something? > You got it right. And I agree, if we leave the proposal at this, that meana a lot of tags. So first, we can ignore the big peninsulas like Europe. I only used that for the example. Second, for big peninsulas we can use only one unifying tag like peninsula:1:wikidata=Q12837 <http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q12837> and forget about names. Names can be added in Wikidata. Janko
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
