They all sound much like offices (landuse=commercial) to me. Ownership has nothing to do with land use. In this case, the city council happen to be the users of the property, but if they need to downsize for whatever reason and a particular building gets a new tenant, will the land use change? I wouldn't have thought so.
What you are describing here, sounds like a use case for "site relations": http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site Colin On 2014-03-16 15:54, Tod Fitch wrote: > What about for the area where the town hall, city administration buildings > (offices for building and safety, parks and recreation, etc.), public safety > (police and fire headquarters) and a county court building are located in my > city. They are all on one landscaped area with buildings scattered around. > And it definitely looks different than a typical office park. The individual > buildings are tagged as appropriate but the land use is neither commercial, > industrial nor residential. > > -Tod > > On Mar 16, 2014, at 1:45 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Am 16/mar/2014 um 02:20 schrieb johnw <jo...@mac.com>: I am looking for a tag > to define the area the townhall building sits on what about amenity=townhall > ? That's how we do it for schools, universities etc. cheers, Martin > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging [1] _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging [1] Links: ------ [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
