On 4/1/14 1:01 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > I'd be happy to do that; what do others think? While semantically > correct, I think more mapper might understand "URL". is it a URI or a URL? if it's strictly a URL, that's fine, URL as a term is not deprecated, it's merely a subset of URI. but if you intend to be able operate on the URN side of the URI house, then you need to use URI properly.
as for ref, i think that the door to the barn has been open for a long time and it may be challenging to accomplish a general fix. i think instead that for specific entities that use ref (e.g., highways) you'll get farther by specifying what ref means for the class of entity. richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
