Am 22.07.2014 19:28, schrieb fly: > Am 22.07.2014 18:58, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: >> 2014-07-22 18:31 GMT+02:00 Никита <acr...@gmail.com >> <mailto:acr...@gmail.com>>: >> >> Hello everyone! Target minage (age_group) should be different from >> legal minage (current tag min_age). >> >> >> >> generally agree (there might be exceptions etc., and it really is not a >> strictly legal restriction but more kind of a guideline in the cases I >> know of). Still as mentioned before, for schools and kindergartens there >> is ISCED level as a tag for an international standard. >> > +1 > > Please, also think about the existing confusion and about the future. > Mappers will always mix up the tags/definitions if tag names are that > similar. +1, different tags make sense. Ideally something, that immediately makes the difference clear (something containing "recommended" or "dedicated" would be good). > If we need different tags for legal vs providing/dedicated we should use > a completely different tag like age_group=* , dedicated_age=* or similar. I've found 72 schools and kindergartens that have minage=* with overpass-turbo [1]. That's reasonably much for a tag with ~600 uses. > > By the way there is no kindergarten [1] nor school tagged with *age* or > min* so far. min_age is not mentioned on both wiki pages. e.g. we should > remove the example on the min_age wiki page. > > Cheers fly > > > [1] > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=amenity&value=kindergarten#combinations > > [2] > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=amenity&value=school#combinations
Cheers, Florian [1]: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/4iJ
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
