I myself, and I think more Dutch mappers, are using bicycle=designated (along with highway=residential or perhaps highway=unclassified) for a so called "fietsstraat" ("cyclestreet"). It's a road that has been set up for bicycles, but has access for all road users. Often they have a board like http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/84/Fietsstraat.JPG/207px-Fietsstraat.JPG (text: "Cyclestreet - Cars are guests").
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com> wrote: > So how one should tag in following situations? I would tag as follows: > 1) official cycleway highway=cycleway > 2) road/footway/path widely used by cyclists, cycling is legal highway=footway/path, bicycle=yes > 3) road/footway/path widely used by cyclists, cycling is illegal but usually > nobody > bothers to enforce this rule highway=footway/path, bicycle=permissive > 4) road/footway/path not used widely by cyclists, cycling is illegal highway=footway (bicycle=no implied) or highway=<roadtype>/path, bicycle = no > 5) road where normally cyclists are banned but special signs/some other > rules > change this bicycle=yes > 6) signed cycle route, cycling is legal Whichever of the above applies > 7) signed cycle route, cycling is illegal but usually nobody bothers to > enforce this rule Idem > 8) signed cycle route, cycling is illegal and this rule is enforced Idem -- André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging