The usual english term applied to beaches is 'clothing optional'. Phil (trigpoint)
On Tue Aug 19 2014 11:54:21 GMT+0100 (BST), Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > Am 19.08.2014 09:37, schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > > > >> > >> Is it reasonable to define that it defaults to no? I am worried about > >> another obvious tag (nudism=no) appearing everywhere. > > > this is entirely dependent on the culture, but I agree that in the region I > map nudism=no can safely be assumed to be the default. > > Maybe a more generic tag like dress_code would also catch these places? This > was already proposed some time ago IIRR. Besides restaurants or beaches the > dress code tag might also apply to other places, eg in Italy for most > religious places you are expected to have your shoulders covered and shorts > are often not allowed (eg monasteries and churches). > > It could also be interesting sometimes if nudism is obligatory or clothing is > admitted as well > > > cheers, > Marti -- Sent from my Jolla _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
