On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 10:01:47AM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2014-11-04 22:56 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann <b...@volki.at>: > > > This discussion comes late. Both natural=ridge and natural=arete have been > > approved by voting just 2 years ago. > > > > > arguably it is not too late, there are only 450 uses of arete by now (and > 17K+ ridges). Please also note that the tag "natural=arete" was formally > rejected (not enough votes: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Proposed_features/arete > )
after two years in the wiki where it was marked as approved and active it would not appear as a great idea to declare the vote for invalid based on nitpicking formalities, how many votes were missing for approval? Would be better to make a new proposal including details of a transition path. Another reason I don't like current arete/ridge state is that some ridges are very long - and they may be partially arete and ridge in different segments. Having a way that is tagged partially as natural=ridge and partially as natural=arete seems like a bad idea. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
