2014-11-17 23:26 GMT+01:00 Kotya Karapetyan <kotya.li...@gmail.com>: > What about introducing a name space: > water_source:potable=designated | mineral | heilwasser (I failed to find a > good English-language analogue, could someone help please?) >
I'd make this "water:quality" and values potable | mineral | de:heilwasser (or an English correspondent if available, or DE:heilwasser because it refers to German legislation) maybe also add "toxic" / "contaminated"(?), "non-potable" not sure about "radioactive"? > water_source:sparkling=yes | no | unknown > in analogy: "water:effervescent" (or ~:sparkling) > water_source:nonpotable=compromised | designated > could maybe be integrated in the quality-tag? > > In principle, details regarding the kind of water source could be provided > here as well, to free up the top level a bit and help data users: > > water_source:type = tap | fountain | well | spring > or have this inherited from the main tag (e.g. amenity=fountain, man_made=water_tap, natural=spring, man_made=water_well cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
