Let's look at the entity relations in play here. Surely a club IS an organisation, not a building. The club MAY USE one or more buildings, and MAY OWN one or more buildings. A club HAS a contact address, HAS members, HAS a "board" etc etc. So following the rules of "one object, one set of tags", putting "club=chess" on a building could be considered to be wrong, as the building may be used by several clubs. Bearing in mind how some people hate multi-valued tags with semicolons, how about "club:chess=meeting_place"? Then multiple clubs could use the same building, each with a different role if required. Otherwise use a simple node (per club) within the building to indicate some relationship between the club and the building.
Colin On 2014-11-24 14:36, Richard Z. wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:13:07PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2014-11-24 13:57 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. <ricoz....@gmail.com>: According to the > approved http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Club [1] chess > has an own club=chess, as has fishing, automobile, hiking - all of which can > be either leisure type or sport type activities. I think "club=automobile" > for a motorsport / racing club would not be very well chosen as this might > really mean a lot of different things, some of them clearly neither "leisure" > nor "sport", e.g. the "ADAC" (biggest German automobile club, almost every > 4th German is a member, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADAC [2] ) does organize > also some racing event, but is mostly seen as kind of insurance if your car > breaks down (and as very strong political lobbyist advocating mainly > individual motorized traffic). Documentation of the club tag is very scarse > at the moment: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:club [3] and I am not sure how it > can be improved, e.g. if I wanted to write something about club=automobile, > would I have to write to all the mappers that have put these 127 club=automobile on the map, to ask what they have used the tag for? I think much the same problem exists with other club=value as well like club=chess? Nevertheless.. you may walk by a building with a tag something like a "chess-club" and if it is mapped as club=chess it is "correct". It is also fairly un-informative but we are supposed to map what we see and not do background checks of clubs with google or wikipedia? Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging [4] Links: ------ [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Club [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADAC [3] http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:club [4] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
