Hi, Am 2015-01-18 um 19:02 schrieb fly: > Additional to below I want to mention that on a micromapping style a > traffic_signal is placed one the pedistrian crossing or the stop_line. I > even came across ones one the stop_line and an addition highway=crossing > on the pedestrian crossing. > > I am tagging direction=* for the direcion it faces. > > Together with the :lanes tagging you do not need any relation at all but > could simply add the information on the node with :lanes tagging
I agree you. I have described a way to map it without relations using lane tagging which should exist if you want to have useful traffic simulations. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Traffic_Signals#This_tagging_scheme_is_the_total_opposite_of_KISS I mentioned this proposal at German OSM forum. http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=29712 Main comments there: A large number of traffic lights/crossings have no programm. The show green to the branch streets if a waits there. Otherwise they show red to the branch streets and green to the main street. There are also traffic lights in cities which - show green for a couple of minutes if fire brigades approach to "clean the way". - can have extra-extra programms if a special event changes traffic flow - have multiple programms (one on the morning rush hour, one for the low-traffic periode between 9 and 12 a.m., one afternoon programm, one evening rush hour programm, one late-evening programm and a Sunday programm) Best regards Michael -- I prefer GPG-encrypted emails.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
