On 3/02/2015 7:51 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
On Feb 1, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Warin wrote:

On 2/02/2015 10:22 AM, Tod Fitch wrote:
On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:50 PM, David Bannon wrote:
I would like to have some of the items on Extend_camp_site page brought onto 
the main camp_site page. Specifically the site/pitch specific tags at 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site#Tagging_of_individual_pitches

While they are not widely used, I see a fairly big geographical distribution 
which implies that they might be understood and universal enough to warrant 
better mention.

And, of course, I used them myself when mapping a couple of U.S. Forest Service 
campgrounds. :)

-Tod

I've edited the wiki page on camp sites 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site  to include links 
to the tags for fee, shower, laundry, firepit and water tap. Tod you could do 
the same for your desired additional tags? Any complaints to me.. or just edit 
the page yourself?


I just set out to edit the page per your suggestion with the thought I could 
just block copy the site/pitch specific stuff from 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site#Tagging_of_individual_pitches
 to below your changes at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site#Additional_Features 
and immediately ran into a conceptual (on my part) road block.

I think that some of the tags I would like to copy over might be conflict with yours. For example, 
"Power connection point. May be connected to a caravan" (may conflict with 
"camp_site:electric=yes/no").



I've reread what you wrote. The added table is to do with adding other nodes/areas so you can see where these thing are within the camp site (or elsewhere). 'Your' tags are characteristics of the campsite and should go in the first table? At least that would be my interpretation of "camp_site:electricity=yes/no" .. So there should be no conflict that way. The second table things should be rendered as per usual, really a way of encouraging there use and reducing the search time for them. I don't know how yours would be rendered. Maybe things could go in a possible third table? Don't know .. see how it looks after a day?If the things in the second table are used .. then why added extras at all? Might be best to leave them out? Depends on people adding the second table tags, but that is true also for 'your' tags....


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to