On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com > wrote:
> I'd expect the width to be the width of the bollard and maxwidth the (in > theory "legal") width of the vehicle that can pass through (e.g. number > taken by reading off a sign) and you might want to add > maxwidth:physical=1.22m (the actual maximum width of a vehicle or person > that can pass through). Oregon's got some badly designed cycleways, since in theory anything human powered up to 3 feet wide can legally traverse unless otherwise signed, but there are bollards and bike barriers that are closer spaced than this and present a real hazard (particularly underwidth bicycle barriers, since these tend to have other spacing problems that make larger standard bicycles and some increasingly common varieties (particularly larger ones like goods bikes <http://dguides.com/portland/events/upcoming-events/the-school-lunch-shakedown-tour-wheels-around-portland-free-salads-september-24-25-2011/>, bikes with extended wheelbases <http://bakfiets.nl/eng/>, or pretty much anything pulling trailers <http://www.utilitycycling.org/2011/01/carrying-your-stuff-bicycle-cargo-trailers/>, that are otherwise perfectly legal, difficult to completely impossible to navigate). In other words: A potential tag combination might be maxwidth=3', maxwidth:physical=2'3"...
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
