Am 27.02.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > 2015-02-27 14:24 GMT+01:00 fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com>: > >> Though, I am not sure how to model steps with fading steps to one or >> both sides and several upper or lower > > I am not sure if I understand "fading steps" correctly. Usually I'd say > that the single step is there as long as there is any kind of riser (in > German the term is "Steigung", see http://www.vbg.de/apl/zh/z113/8.gif for > reference). I imagine you intend with "fading" that the riser will get > smaller along the single step until it reaches zero. That zero point is the > end of the stairs and if these ends of the single steps of one stair are > not in a line you'll have to model also a "lateral" way (typically they are > in line).
Well have a look: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9b/Augustinerplatz_%28Freiburg_im_Breisgau%29_5340.jpg http://ais.badische-zeitung.de/piece/02/88/16/82/42473090.jpg > I think the easiest way to represent several upper and lower is to model > several stairs, one for each upper+lower combo. This can happen for example > when there are blocks in the middle of the stairs. Do I really need one relation for every step ? > Here is a reference picture of one of the most famous stairs outdoors: > http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_bekannter_Treppen#mediaviewer/File:Spanische-Treppe.jpg > To model the lower main part (between the lateral walls and until the 2 > dominant street lights) you'll need 9 relations: 3 times (left, middle, > right) 3 parts of stairs (the former divided by 2 landings). I suggest to > model the landings as highway=pedestrian, area=yes. Well, go for it. Cheers fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
