Final call for comments on this, please. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do it. > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> > wrote: > >> Resubmitting by request of maper Sly: >> >> The edit described at >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Bryce_C_Nesbitt >> was modified based on mailing list input, and sits at complete removal of >> the "cluster" value for denotation, along with a certain fixme value. >> >> The "cluster" value was introduced to mean "non-special tree". The tag >> was spread by a hotly disputed and partially reverted bot, and the tag >> moved from there, finding its way onto a rather random assortment of trees, >> water towers and sea buoys. Removing just the bot added tags is not enough >> to fix the damage caused. >> >> No other values of denotation are at risk. >> No human entered fixme values will be harmed. >> The edit is proposed worldwide, though the impact is highly "clustered". >> >> Simple typos such as *dentoation=clustar* may be handled at the same >> time. >> Named trees with denotation=cluster are likely mis-tagged now. >> >> Landmark trees marked cluster will be handled manually when noted. For >> example: >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3321396264/history >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> > > > -- > Dave Swarthout > Homer, Alaska > Chiang Mai, Thailand > Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
