> On Mar 30, 2015, at 1:05 AM, johnw <[email protected]> wrote: > > Okay - I have a question - If Jan’s proposal sets the basic category, And > this one sets the amenity level, Is is possible to base this around access to > the spaces? it seems to set the whole tone of the camp. > > RV & Caravan / car camping / tent camping? An RV camp usually has spaces and > facilities meant for RVs, Car camping has spots with a parking spot at each > site and space for tenting next to it ( a “Auto Camp” in Japan, and a lot of > US State/national park camps) , and tents are plots laid out near each other, > with cars or other access *not* directly next to the sites (like a large > scout camp or camping in some traditional parks with grass and a playground). > > I would like to designate the level that way first, and then make a bunch of > camp_site:x=yes/no tags to denote facilities that are common to the sites or > the camp itself. > > There will be a million different combinations of amenities from camp to camp > and country to country, so setting the basic *layout* type of the camp is the > most important. I have found some really bare and tiny camps with nice > kitchens which would not fit nicely into the categories based around amenity > - so set the amenities by themselves - and base it around camp layout. > > > > camp_site:restaurant=yes > camp_site:water=yes > camp_site:space_water=no > campsite:kitchen=yes > camp_site:space_bbq=no > camp_site:space_power=yes > camp_site:attendant=yes > > This is really extesible, as some countries have amenties that are unheard of > in other countries (netting, fishing ponds) etc, and are easily added without > trying to redefine the entire camp_site= values. > > > and for camps that offer the additional types of camping, as sometimes an RV > camp has some car camping spots, then add it as an additional value, since > for the example it’s predominantly an RV camp. > > camp_site=car_camping=yes > > Javbw > > >> On Mar 30, 2015, at 4:23 PM, David Bannon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 05:44 +0000, Jan van Bekkum wrote: >>> ...... I hope someone else will stand up to kick off the camp_site=* >>> proposal for facility levels. >>> >> OK Jan, hint taken. >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Camp_Site >> >> Very early, lot more needs be done. I'm going to be tight on time over >> next couple of weeks so anyone with a keyboard ...... >>
Might also want to review the older proposal at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site Some of the things like camp_site:space_*=yes/no seem to be well covered under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site#Tagging_of_individual_pitches Cheers, Tod
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
