Here again comes the spirit of "approved", i.e. voted-on tags :-(
If one wants to avoid conflicts, one will always use different tags than tags that are already in use. A proposal should be the documentation of new tags that are actually used(!). A proposal should not be a drawing board idea that will only be used after some vote, just to find out five minutes later that it can't handle some common cases. 2015-04-07 13:40 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > 2015-04-07 13:33 GMT+02:00 Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com>: > >> Don't mistake "voting" with "documenting". And btw: neither the one nor >> the other prevents any mapper of misusing any tag. >> > > the difference is that someone who has a different idea of the definition > of a proposal in draft or proposed status could think that the definition > will change in the direction he promotes, while for a feature that has been > successfully voted on he would more likely choose a different tag to avoid > conflict. >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
