The voting was officially closed by today, but I'll leave it open for another week. So far 13 people have voted.
Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards, *Jan van Bekkum* www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbek...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree that we should not use the star system or six categories It is > becoming far too complex for mappers and renderers. This level of > refinement must be achieved with additional attributes or extra amenities > in a relation. > > I really do want to keep *non-designated* as currently proposed. It was > my main reason to start with the proposal. I understand it is not important > in western countries, but it is vital in Africa and the Middle East. It is > a site with the opportunistic blessing and amenity use of a hotel/ hostel, > etc. > > Why do we need to keep trekking? Isn't it a special case of unimproved? > Summarized my preference is > > - Designated > - Unimproved (although I like the word Basic better) > - Non-designated > - Wild_camp_site: separate namespace tag for unimproved without > blessing > > >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
