On 7/05/2015 3:18 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That proposal has no listings for Australia (possibly
www.*nationaltrust*.org.au/ <http://org.au/> ?) and ignores
British www.*nationaltrust*.org.uk/ <http://org.uk/> ?
I've no idea how the 'level' is decided .. while it gives some
examples, it does not look like it has any explanation of how to
determine this.
It is a proposal ... and needs some work? Certainly more
explanation. At the moment I cannot use the heritage tag.
I thought "level" should correspond to the admin level of the
institute that lists the object. E.g. when it is done on country level
-> 2. In Belgium it is done on regional level (Flanders, Brussels,
Wallonia) -> 4.
regards
m
If taken that way then the British and Australian National Trusts would
level 2.
If it is not clear (as in very obvious) to me .. then it probably is not
clear to others....
Stating how the level is determine would be more usefull than the table
as the table will never cover all instances.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
