John Willis wrote
>> On Aug 29, 2015, at 7:17 AM, geow <

> ksgeo@

> > wrote:
>> 
>> An additional highway type "trail" is no solution to the problem of
>> missing
>> decent classification criteria "path vs footway" and would  likely cause
>> further trouble for many sorts of reasons.
> 
> Being able to confuse a trail and a sidewalk in basic tagging and
> rendering is a horrible and unbelievably misleading situation. Its like
> confusing motorway and driveway. 
> 
> Lets correct this. 
> 
> At least give me highway=trail so I can avoid having Mount Fuji covered
> with sidewalks. 

If you are against the unification in rendering path/footway, as many others
are, you may consider open a pull request or specific issue on
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues

bye
geow



--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/highway-footway-Advanced-definition-Distinction-footway-vs-path-tp5851506p5853397.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to