What about building=apartments building:use=residential;commercial (or retail)
building=mixed doesn't seem to me to be a useful building tag. The building tag should describe the type of building, not its use. Cheers On Monday, August 31, 2015 10:26:27 AM Warin wrote: > On 31/08/2015 8:58 AM, John Willis wrote: > >> On Aug 31, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> uilding=commercial is quite suspect. > > > > To me, there are 2 basic types of mixed use buildings. > > > > mixed_use_urban > > And > > mixed_use_house > > > > There are so many different combinations of retail, residential, hotel, > > and commercial (and in come cases, attraction) That as long as there is > > some kind of residential space (apartments/condos), then it would be > > mixed_use_urban. This is especially true if the public facing part (the > > bottom floor or the side towards the street) are non-residential use (a > > business/shop/not parking). > snip > > > So i suggest those two building types to denote these two basic types of > > mixed use. > I think it better to bite the bullet and start sub tagging correctly ... > thus for a retail mixed with apartments > > building=mixed (or =yes etc) > building:retail=yes > building:apartment=yes > > ? More thoughts please... > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging