On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:56 PM, David Marchal <pene...@live.fr> wrote:
> _______________________________ > > > > On 06/11/2015 10:24, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > > Obviously in places where a road can have multiple equivalent > > references (such as the US) route relations perfect sense (as does > > figuring out which routes are actually signed on which bits of road) > > but in places where there's only one real ref per piece of tarmac (such > > as the UK) there's no need to force mappers to start maintaining > > relations as well as just recording the reference. > > I also agrees with Paul. This proposal can be useful in some situations, > but not all networks are such a mess. Here, in France, apart from E-roads,, > there are virtually no road with several refs, and, AFAIK, that's the same > for nearby countries. Besides, maintaining such a long relation can quickly > become a nightmare, so I don't think it would really be useful in most > situations, even if I understand it could be useful in some situations, > like the USA networks you described. Toby's solution of favoring the relations over the way value of ref=* would cover this.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
