I honestly think Mapbox needs to stop immediately editing ways that they think 
are invalid.  I've seen several ways that I've work hard on, know are valid, 
and are being damaged by edits.  The 'NONE' tag in turn lanes is COMPLETELY 
VALID!!!!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rickmastfan67/diary/38833

[http://www.openstreetmap.org/assets/osm_logo_256-835a859acf0d378e1d14e88b15e7b4b95211ccd41a2c061b1629cfbbb8deb697.png]<https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rickmastfan67/diary/38833>

OpenStreetMap | rickmastfan67's diary | Gotta love people who don't look at the 
satillte imagery and ajacent ways and think that turn lanes need to be fixed. 
:/<https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rickmastfan67/diary/38833>
www.openstreetmap.org
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use 
under an open license.


Here's just a few examples where the 'none' tag is COMPLETELY VALID to describe 
brand new lanes starting.  However, the Mapbox editors are ripping it out and 
turning the lane info into something completely invalid.

[http://www.openstreetmap.org/assets/osm_logo_256-835a859acf0d378e1d14e88b15e7b4b95211ccd41a2c061b1629cfbbb8deb697.png]<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39935935>

OpenStreetMap | Changeset: 
39935935<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39935935>
www.openstreetmap.org
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use 
under an open license.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39934184 & 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39935935 & 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39937801

[http://www.openstreetmap.org/assets/osm_logo_256-835a859acf0d378e1d14e88b15e7b4b95211ccd41a2c061b1629cfbbb8deb697.png]<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39937801>

OpenStreetMap | Changeset: 
39937801<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39937801>
www.openstreetmap.org
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use 
under an open license.



Those are just 3 examples of ways I edited that have been damaged by not paying 
attention to adjacent ways.

[http://www.openstreetmap.org/assets/osm_logo_256-835a859acf0d378e1d14e88b15e7b4b95211ccd41a2c061b1629cfbbb8deb697.png]<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39934184>

OpenStreetMap | Changeset: 
39934184<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39934184>
www.openstreetmap.org
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use 
under an open license.



________________________________
From: Mike N <nice...@att.net>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 6:32:49 PM
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Turn Lane Tagging?


This is on the way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316565385

On 6/10/2016 5:18 PM, Rubén López Mendoza wrote:
> Hey Mikel,
> can you send  the exact place where did you find the change?
>
> We are working fixing the invalid turn lanes.
>
> Thanks,
> Ruben
>
> 2016-06-10 16:00 GMT-05:00 Mike N <nice...@att.net
> <mailto:nice...@att.net>>:
>
>
>     I'm seeing a number of turn lane tagging fixes referencing
>     http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/#/admin/invalidturnlanes and making
>     fixes such as
>
>     before:
>        lanes=4
>        oneway=yes
>         turn:lanes =left|through|through;right
>
>     after:
>        lanes=4
>        oneway=yes
>        left|||
>
>      The wiki at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn:lanes
>     doesn't seem to match.   Is this new, and where is it documented?
>
>      Thanks,
>


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to