Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> writes: > sent from a phone > >> Il giorno 20 lug 2016, alle ore 15:06, Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> ha >> scritto: >> >> There >> are many shopping malls near me, and the ways have no access tags. >> That's wrong, as they aren't public rights of way. But it is amazingly >> rare, almost unheard of, to be told not to be there at least at >> reasonable times. > > > unless of course you look like a homeless person or are pursuing some > kind of political campaign or are asking people for money etc. Really > in these private pseudo public spaces the owner can expel people at > will for no reason or any reason.
True, except that they can't expel them for an unlawful reason :-) But in all seriousness, these usually do not have access tags, and that is not an actual problem. I realize this is blurring rendering, but I see annotations on access=private/no (which is good), and on access=permissive (which is fine, for things that truly fit permissive). But putting the permissive icon on shopping mall ways would not serve the map users well. So I really just meant that 'pseudo-public' as you call it, which is a good term, is another case that's between access=yes and access=permissive. Something like access=public_welcome_if_you_arent_doing_something_usually_objectionable_on_pseudopublic_land but at least a little less verbose.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
