Would love to compare notes on that, but it'll have to be later next week. If you want to look at what I do for exits, feel free to examine pretty much all of them on I 75 south of Atlanta, as well as through downtown.
--jack On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > I've given it a little minor tag-completion update if anybody wants to > compare notes. > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Duane Gearhart <du...@mapzen.com> wrote: > >> FYI - the exit 78 interchange information has been updated. The Mapzen >> directions are calling out the exit as you expected >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=mapzen_car&ro >> ute=31.67026%2C-83.61169%3B31.66674%2C-83.61442#map=18/31.66803/-83.61124 >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:06 AM, David Mease <meas...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> My interpretation: >>> >>> What is the proper method to use turn:lanes to tag freeway lanes >>>>> approaching an exit, where the exit branches directly from an edge lane >>>>> without being part of the freeway itself, but the freeway lanes are not >>>>> signed with an arrow, such as this one? >>>>> http://mapillary.com/map/im/7igAGXSa6EsUYlTIujXchw >>>>> >>>> >>> This exit has no turn lane. There is no staging lane prior to the exit >>> where tags could be placed, one should not be created just so that there is >>> a place to put tags. This freeway should not be split. You said yourself >>> that the exit is not part of the freeway itself, so tags should not be >>> placed on the freeway. This intersection is a candidate for the destination >>> tag. >>> >>> >>>> mapping the road markings seems extremely strange - what if they are >>>> very faded, when do we map them ? is there a threshold of % of the paint >>>> left ? >>>> >>> what is there are no road markings but there are signs ? >>>> >>> >>> Same difference. But the arrow in the above example is pointing to where >>> the exit is, not describing a turn lane preceding the exit. >>> >>> >>>> do we remove those tags during the winter in some regions ? >>>> >>> >>> Do we remove the name tag from roads when the street signs get iced over >>> or overgrown with vegetation? >>> >>> mapping of markings separately also seems to have no functional benefit. >>>> the information should be useful for navigation >>> >>> >>> Road markings are both beneficial and useful for navigation. Cities and >>> governments have paid a lot of money installing them all over globe >>> precisely for these reasons. OSM would be well served to include them >>> exactly as is. I don't hear a lot of people complaining about how those >>> arrows on the roads led them astray. >>> >>> In the above example, I would not expect navigation software to direct >>> me to get into the lane marked with a slight right arrow. In fact, I would >>> be miffed when I found there was no such lane. All I would expect is a >>> simple "In x distance take exit 78 towards Sycamore/Ocilla" >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-us mailing list >>> talk...@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-us mailing list >> talk...@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
