On 2016-09-02 15:19, Jo wrote: > The way I understand this, no explicit tagging is needed. You could have > > aBBc > > Where c is the service way of the terminal. I think that, just like within a plain highway, using the same node (B) twice in succession makes no sense. I bet that JOSM won't be happy about it.
Cheers André. > > Polyglot > > 2016-09-02 14:13 GMT+02:00 André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com > <mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>>: > > On 2016-09-02 11:43, Michael Tsang wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am mapping bus routes in my city. There is a route where the buses >> need >> reversing in order to enter the bus terminus. Is there a "standard" role >> in >> the route relation which denotes that the bus is to reverse through that >> segment of the road? >> >> Michael > Hi, > > Supposing that the bus passes the T(erminus) point, goes to the > E(nd) point and comes back to T(erminus) point, > your relation will simply contain .....abcTET > The other relation that describes the return journey will probably > contain only Tcba... > > Cheers > > André. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
