Thank you for your feedback.
This is an important topic but I think that fixing a typo and approving
a tag are two different needs. Whether this tag is validated or not, I
think it should be fixed because the intent of those contributors was to
put building_passage and not those fancy variations, even if they are
wrong. It can also help to highlight errors in some tools.
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
Le 10/09/2016 à 13:23, Simone Saviolo a écrit :
Yes, an obvious one: a building_passage *goes through a building* :)
Semantically it is quite important to distinguish between a
colonnade/arcade and a building passage (BTW, also arcades and
colonnades have their own tag). covered=yes just implies that the
building is over the highway, but it might even mean that a protruding
balcony "covers" the way.
Regards,
Simone
2016-09-10 13:09 GMT+02:00 Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com
<mailto:davefoxfa...@btinternet.com>>:
Hmm...
The building_passage tag (65 445) is a new one to me.
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage
<http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage>
Looking at the wiki it's very similar to covered=yes (254 624)
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/covered
<http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/covered>
I thought there was a discussion here where it was agreed to be a
tunnel it would need to be below natural ground (ie a mountain or
river bed).
These 'building_passage' all appear to be at ground level.
Is there a difference I'm not aware of?
Dave F.
On 10/09/2016 11:42, LeTopographeFou wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed several typo errors in tag values. I would like to
fix them when it is obvious. When they all came from one user,
it's easy to contact him and agree on a fix. When it's worldwide
and multi contributors it becomes difficult to identify the right
contributor for each tag and contact them one by one (unless
there is a tool to say "this value for this key of this/those
object(s) have been assigned by Xxx, Yyy..."). In all cases I
want to document the edit in the wiki. But do I have to ask for a
vote/discussion for automated typo edits? The wiki is unclear on
this point.
So I've made a proposal here for a first edit:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23002_-_Typos_with_tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23002_-_Typos_with_tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage>
Thank you for your feedback
* vote is ok
* don't worry, document and do when it's obvious
* edit one by one/contact authors one by one
* do nothing and let the time do his work
* are you silly? automated edits are evil for typos!
* ... ?
Yours,
--
LeTopographeFou
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing
list Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
