On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, 23:41 Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> wrote: > The correct tagging would certainly be "amenity" with several values, > separated by semicolons. > That's allowed by the osm data structure. We (try to) avoid it because of > the inherent problems with the subsequent rendering. > Maybe we could do it in the way the ingredients are listed on food stuff: > a list in decreasing order of importance. A simple renderer would simply > use the first value of the list, but specialised ones are free to use also > the remaining values of the key. >
Wow! I think that will certainly need a dedicated thread by itself. And doesn't address the problem of having an exception in the bar definition. Indeed looks like amenity=cafe, amenity=bar and amenity=pub have the same meaning in Mediterranean counties. Best regards, Alejandro Suárez > > On 7 Dec 2016 22:50, "ksg" <ks...@web.de> wrote: > > > Am 07.12.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer < > dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > > > > sent from a phone > > > > for me, amenity=cafe implies tables and chairs, many bars don't have > tables, just a bar. > > > I admit that an Italian bar is different from a german cafe in almost each > and every way ;) > > But amongst the alternatives „bar“ „pub“ and „cafe“, wouldn’t be the > latter the best choice? > > Klaus (geow) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
