> On Mar 13, 2017, at 5:22 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'd rather use water=stream_pool without the lake deviation, but then it
> still is in conflict with water=river. Are these actual features anyway, or
> are they simply the wider parts of the river?
+1 for stream_pool.
The features they are talking about are usually where a normally shallow stream
feeds into topography (man made or natural) that creates a much
deeper/wide/slower moving section of the tiny stream than “normal", allowing
someone to reasonably submerge their body, or jump into. this is an
“attraction” of the stream, usually used by people hiking or playing in the
water. Some of them may be locally famous.
Ah!
I would put these under leisure. they are only useful for some kind of leisure
activity.
If I was interested in tagging the features of a certain spot for campers or
backpackers to set up a tent, (like micromapping a part of a park), then
mapping these might be useful, as you might choose one location over another
based on having this pool available.
having water=pool sounds like a recipe for incorrectly tagged swimming pools.
Javbw
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
