> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:24:39 +0100 > From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > To: daveswarth...@gmail.com, "Tag discussion, strategy and related > tools" <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] water=pool > Message-ID: <edcc78a7-c56d-48e2-8e88-8dd81fbc5...@gmail.com> > > > > sent from a phone > > > On 22 Mar 2017, at 08:53, Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Either waterway=pool (TagInfo: 26 uses), or waterway=stream_pool, would be > better than water=stream_pool. > > > I would prefer water over waterway as a key, because this is about > areas/polygons, for > which we typically use natural=water and subtags. This would also allow to > keep > waterway=riverbank for the whole stream-/river-area (which is so far the only > significant exception where waterway is used for areas and not as a linear > graph > model). > I would be ok with leisure as well, although this is mostly used for > artificial features so > far, and there might raise some confusion with "ordinary" swimming pools. > > > cheers, > Martin
To categorize these pools as a subcategory of leisure seems shortsighted to me, because that may not be the only use for them, just as not all swimming pools are for leisure. I would prefer they be tagged as a value of water or waterway, instead of inferring they are only for leisure. Mark _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
