Hi George, Did you watch the accompanying screencast as well? I'm practicing for SOTM-FR, so I started recording what I'm doing. I'm also planning to do regular Google Hangouts (on Air) on the subject of PT. Those would be on European 'evenings', I'm not sure what time it would be in NSW then, but you would be welcome to join in.
Regarding the stop_area relations, there is a setting to disable those tests, which should be 'enabled' by default. So those warnings should not appear for most use cases. I'll create a ticket for it, then Giacomo can take care of it, when coding for GSoC starts. Regarding the settings, Open JOSM, press F12, switch on expert mode in the lower left, go to the Setting Preferences Entries directly pane and search for 'add', set "message_add_primitve_to_relation" to false". I hope that's the one that's influencing that behaviour. Cheers, Jo 2017-05-19 11:44 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > Thanks Jo + George > > On 19-May-17 03:18 PM, Georg Feddern wrote: > >> Am 19.05.2017 um 04:21 schrieb Warin: >> >>> >>> P1) JOSM validator reports that the relation is not closed. Yet all >>> elements appear and they are connected. >>> >> >> I cannot verify/reproduce the first part/sentence with JOSM (11639 / >> 12039). >> >> > Think you got it after Jo modified it. :) > > Thank you Jo that makes sense. I am use to forming circular ways for other > relations ... but they don't contain duplicated members. > I would have formed something similar ... if I could add duplicated > members to the relation. > > And that is where my problem lies! Any time I try to add a way that is > already part of the relation .. it does not happen. > No error message. > Chose to add at the end or begin of the listed members, or above or below > the selected member ... not added. > > So there is some setting that prevents me adding a duplicate, probably a > very good feature that helps for most things .. > but it would be even better in this instance if it simply gave a warning > message and allowed a selection of options. > Perhaps in the past I have turned this setting off? > > Humm Control C and V works ... so I'll use that > The present route is not absolutely correct.. but better than the original > I had! > At least now it goes in a circular mode. Just needs an added repetition. > > Ok - now it has the correct route! Phew. > > I do get a warning - PT: Stop position or platform is not part of a stop > area relation... 9 of them. > > >> P2) Roles forward/backward are apparently no longer used, and a role to >>> indicate that both directions does not exist. Yet these may assist to have >>> these kinds of roles? >>> >> >> Not necessary - see above. 'Used' direction is always defined by order. >> >> P3) stop_position ... left side or right side of the way? On a train line >>> this probably works well .. on a road that has traffic in both directions >>> with parking on both sides .. stop_position does not have all that much >>> information. >>> >> >> Yep, thats the way of OSM - the information is in the order of the >> relation and the platforms. >> >> Thoughts? >>> >> >> Done. ;-) >> >> Georg >> >> >> _ >> > > Ok .. I have some more reading to do on these 'platforms'. Want to get rid > of that warning. > And resolve the 'bus stops' too. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
