W dniu 03.12.2017 o 10:04, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze:
I’m against both proposals (for the current situation, but with more changes to the whole system it might change), for 1 it was demonstrated that there are cases of nature reserves which aren’t protected areas according to osm tag definitions
There was a lot of comments, so I might miss something - could you remind these cases?
I think I have shown that nature reserve is always about protection (but not about leisure, so current namespace is wrong).
and for 2 I believe simple and self explanatory tagging is preferable over more complicated, not human readable, equally detailed alternative tagging
Having only simple tagging makes it hard to create any meaningful classification system.
For admin levels we also use some "magic" numbers instead of human readable tags ("state", "province", "county") and that system is working. It also is easier to parse, hence consume the data.
-- "My method is uncertain/ It's a mess but it's working" [F. Applec _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
